Skip to main content

Game Theory Might Explain Why Traffic Apps Make Traffic Worse

The recent proliferation of traffic apps like Waze that promise to help you avoid backups and slowdowns are now being credited with perversely slowing everybody down and UC Berkeley’s Alexandre Bayen, director of its Institute of Transportation Studies, argues that we can explain why with game theory.

That’s the theory whose creator was biographized in A Beautiful Mind. Simply put, it posits that not only can we achieve more if we work together, but when we compete we’re likelier to hold each other back than gain an advantage. And that’s pretty much what’s happening with traffic apps.

Bayen uses the example of a crash on a California freeway, wherein 20% of drivers are alerted to the crash via Waze (or whatever). These people jump off the freeway at the nearest off-ramp, sending them down residential streets.

Although that’s only 20% of the people on the highway, it’s still more than the side streets can handle, causing a secondary backup and frustrating residents and drivers.

Worse still, the people on the highway are backed up, too, because the off-ramp is overwhelmed, causing a tertiary backup that lasts even longer than the original slowing that caused by the accident.

But wait, like a TV sales pitch, there’s more. Not only does Waze cause a secondary and tertiary backup, it causes a quaternary backup going the other because of rubberneckers.

The solution? Listen to your hippy parents and work together. Or, at least, app developers have to listen to their hippy parents to work collaboratively and with cities to make all traffic move faster before any of it can move faster.

The post Game Theory Might Explain Why Traffic Apps Make Traffic Worse appeared first on VWVortex.



from VWVortex https://ift.tt/2EoUmjh
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Saying Goodbye to the CC V6

For all its size and its global reach, Volkswagen is still, in many ways, a deeply human company. There was, for instance, the Bugatti Veyron an ego project if ever there was one. Then the purchase of Ducati, a move most called folly. And then there was the Phaeton, the Volkswagen that most folks can’t afford. Not only were these moves all strange, I’m sure that they made VW’s accountants furious. None of them made good business sense, but they were all deeply interesting and they all are evidence of the heart that beats at the center of VW. Among these follies is the CC, a car that everyone agrees is rakishly handsome, but that no one really wanted to buy. The car couldn’t last, but the world is brighter for its having been in it. With the approach debut of the Arteon, it seems like a good time to look back on its sadly departing predecessor. The version I drove, because I live in Canada, is a V6 Wolfsburg Edition, which apparently isn’t available in the States. Nor is the V6, not as...

Mitsubishi admits it lied about MPG ratings for all vehicles in Japan

Filed under: Government/Legal , Green , Mitsubishi , Fuel Efficiency , Japan Mitsubishi says its shady fuel-economy test practices may have been used on all vehicles it sells and has sold in Japan. Continue reading Mitsubishi admits it lied about MPG ratings for all vehicles in Japan Mitsubishi admits it lied about MPG ratings for all vehicles in Japan originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 11 May 2016 12:36:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink  |  Email this  |  Comments from Autoblog Volkswagen http://ift.tt/21X3bHv

More 3.0-Liter TDI Settlement Details Expected by January 31

Volkswagen and the TDI Plaintiff’s Steering Committee were in court today for another status conference following the agreement in principal reached earlier this week. Little new information was given at the conference held before Judge Charles Breyer today, but the court ordered the parties to develop a formal settlement agreement, class action notices, and a class notice plan by January 31, 2017. For now, though, owners still don’t know how much to expect in compensation. Elizabeth Cabraser, lead Counsel for the Plaintiff’s Steering Committee reaffirmed in a statement today that the compensation would be “substantial.” The potential cost to Volkswagen is widely reported to exceed $1 billion, though, with an additional $225 million going into an environmental trust to help offset excess emissions. Buy back offers are still only expected for the oldest 20,000 of the roughly 80,000 VW Group vehicles sold in America with the 3.0-liter TDI engine. Those vehicles are mostly SUVs, like ...